Tuesday, February 28, 2017

The lake of dreams (2010) by Kim Edwards

   
The Lake of Dreams
by
      
The Lake of Dreams
 
Lucy Jarrett is at a crossroads in her life, still haunted by her father's unresolved death a decade earlier. She returns to her hometown in Upstate New York, The Lake of Dreams, and, late one night, she cracks the lock of a window seat and discovers a collection of objects. They appear to be idle curiosities, but soon Lucy realizes that she has stumbled across a dark secret from her family's past, one that will radically change her—and the future of her family—forever.
 
Blogger- I found the book cliche and contrived.

Beyond the truth: A Hanne Wilhelmsen novel (2003) by Anne Holt

     

Thanks to Tonstant Weader Review for this review!

In a shocking opening sequence, Beyond the Truth begins with an aged, cold, wounded, and hungry stray dog searching for food and shelter in a well-to-do neighborhood that he considers his turf. He is looking for food and shelter. He finds it.
Beyond the Truth by Anne HoltBeyond the Truth is the seventh book in the Hanne Wilhemsen police procedural series by Norwegian author Anne Holt. It takes place between December 19th and December 28th during those post-solstice holiday days with five hours of weak sunlight during the long Nordic nights. It is Christmas in Oslo and four people were murdered. The time of year, the gloomy days with a febrile sun are as much a character in the the book as the people. Place is just everything, and you will shiver more than once.
Three of the victims belong to a well-known family whose internecine legal battles point to some obvious suspects. The other takes a while longer to identify. He a writer and who knows why he was there. The team of investigators that Hanne works with are pleased with their rapid progress in putting together a case against the very guilty looking son who was suing his father.
Meanwhile on the homefront, Hanne’s father has just died, her partner wants to have a baby, and Hanne is thinking of retiring and opening up a detective agency. The real issue, though, is Hanne is not convinced. The case seems almost too linear, too clear. Ignoring the fourth victim offends her sense of fairness, but also it is an affront to reason. They do not know he was an accidental victim.
I’ve been a fan of Scandinavian mysteries ever since I started borrowing Per Wahlöö and Maj Sjöwall from the public library to my 7th grade math teacher’s consternation. It’s not just the chauvinism of the Scandinavian American attachment to an “old country” that exists only in family stories. Scandinavian mysteries approach murder and justice from a worldview that could not be more different from our own, one that sees crime solving more as healing tears in the fabric of community than tough guy warrior exploits. It is a worldview that appeals to me.
I did not realize that this was my first Hanne Wilhemsen mystery, so I was concerned that starting with book seven, I would either be confused or would be inundated with backstory. Happily, I need not have worried. The story was very much in the present. There are some hard feelings and jagged edges in the relationships, but we don’t have to know the play by play to understand the situation and Holt trusts us to not need everything explained.
The solution is slightly surprising, but it is also not completely fair and that is my one quibble with the story. Critical evidence is read, but not shared with readers. A few clues were dropped that alerted readers to the right place to look for a suspect, but there was nothing to lead us to someone specific. So even though, if an alert reader is considering the right universe of suspects, narrowing down to the right one requires revelation. That is only half-fair, but the rest of the book is so good that I don’t care.
 
 


       
 

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Fired up (2009) by Jayne Ann Kentz

Fired Up (Arcane Society, #7; Dreamlight Trilogy, #1)
 
    
More than three centuries ago, Nicholas Winters irrevocably altered his genetic makeup in an obsession-fueled competition with alchemist and Arcane Society founder Sylvester Jones. Driven to control their psychic abilities, each man's decision has reverberated throughout the family line, rewarding some with powers beyond their wildest dreams, and cursing others to a life filled with madness and hallucinations.

Jack Winters, descendant of Nicholas, has been experiencing nightmares and blackouts - just the beginning, he believes - of the manifestation of the Winters family curse. The legend says that he must find the Burning Lamp or risk turning into a monster. But he can't do it alone; he needs the help of a woman with the gift to read the lamp's dreamlight.

Jack is convinced that private investigator Chloe Harper is that woman. It doesn't take long for Chloe to pick up the trail of the missing lamp. And as they draw closer to the lamp, the raw power that dwells within it threatens to sweep them into a hurricane of psychic force.
  

The elephant keeper's children (2010 Danish, 2012 English) by Peter Hoeg


Image result for image peter hoegThe Elephant Keepers' Children is narrated by Peter Finø, the 14-year-old son of the priest on a Danish island also called Finø. The island is almost as much a character as a setting, a surreal place where tough-talking, plain-living working-class families mingle with, and sometimes become, millionaire Buddhists and nouveau riche landowners. There is an ashram in what was once Pigslurry Farm, and an ex-headmaster, Einar Flogginfellow, who likes to "offer sacrifices to the ancient Nordic deity at every full moon on top of Big Hill". (Outsiders question the status of "Big Hill" – 111m above sea level – at the risk of being beaten up by Peter's exquisite astrophysicist brother Hans, who is strong enough to lay horses on their backs and tickle their tummies; the shadow of Pippi Longstocking falls far.)
Hans has left for university in Copenhagen, where Peter and his older sister Tilte are visiting him. While they are there, their parents disappear on holiday in La Gomera, "a wannabe Finø in the Canary Islands". Finø's authorities step in, in the form of the Kommune's director "Bodil Hippopotamus", two plainclothes police officers who stick out on Finø "like two tree frogs on a fish rissole", a drug-addled count who runs a rehabilitation centre as directed by the little blue men who bring him magic mushrooms, a bishop and a forensic psychiatrist.
Tilte and Peter are illegally tagged and imprisoned in the rehabilitation centre, alerting them to the importance to the state of whatever their parents are doing. The pair escape by impersonating a non-existent lizard, stealing a car and inventing a religious cult in order to board an arms dealer's luxurious cruise ship while pretending that a dead body in the wheelchair they are pushing is the ship's doctor. Hiding from the police in a film star's apartment in Copenhagen, they must evade the forces of evil – which invariably turn out to be subject to redemption at Tilte's hands – do the right thing and, if possible, save their parents from the consequences of their own wrongdoing.
Peter Høeg displays a glorious facility for the absurd as well as the picaresque, and the hilarity of Peter Finø's narrative makes this a delightful novel even for readers who have limited tolerance of surrealism. Jokes are not easy to translate and Martin Aitken is to be congratulated. But, as one would expect from Høeg, this a book with ambitions beyond entertainment. The title comes from an "old Indian saying": "In case you wish to befriend an elephant keeper, make certain to have room for the elephant." Peter sees that almost everyone except himself and Tilte has an elephant – a passion or vocation that disrupts relationships and calls its owner to break rules and laws to fulfil a life's ambition. His father's elephant is his own charisma and his mother's is the manufacture of special effects, an unfortunate combination that leads them towards criminal lives.
Other adults – even the most frightening terrorist mastermind – are driven by other gifts and fears, and the other-worldly Tilte sees, forgives (and manipulates) all; readers of Miss Smilla's Feeling for Snow know that Høeg can frighten his readers, but that gift is almost entirely restrained here. The children are clear-sighted about the philosophical questions they encounter in the course of this existential romp: exactly how far do ends justify means? What is the virtuous relationship between personal loyalty and abstract moral rectitude? Should one live with loneliness and, if so, on what terms?
However relevant to the story, these sober moments work less well than the outright comedy. Adult readers tend to have limited patience for the existential musings of even the most entertaining 14-year-old, and most authors must choose between creating strong teenage narrators (as Høeg does here, stretching credibility only as far as his picaresque narrative licenses) and obvious philosophising. Peter intersperses his tale with advice to the reader about "finding freedom" and "opening the door", introducing an element of adolescent moralising that seems – perhaps deliberately – less accomplished than the rest of the book. It's enough of an achievement to bring together Voltaire and PG Wodehouse; you don't need Salinger as well.

Thanks to The Guardian and Sarah Moss ( Names for the Sea: Strangers in Iceland is published by Granta.)

Monday, February 20, 2017

Wurthering Heights (1847) by Emily Bronte


® 2016 Bustle

8 Things You Didn't Notice About 'Wuthering Heights' The First Time You Read It 

By Lara Rutherford-Morrison  Mar 17 2015

SIX REACTIONS

 The first time I read Wuthering Heights, I hated it. Hated it. I was in high school, and I was just beginning what would be a life-long love affair with 19th-century literature. I had barreled through all of Austen’s novels and Jane Eyre, and I sat down with Wuthering Heights, expecting to be amazed, and instead, found myself feeling a weird combination of boredom and fury. It wasn’t until I got to graduate school that the novel “clicked” for me—I started reading it for a class, thinking, “Ugh, not this again,” and then somewhere around page 100 found myself engrossed and wondering where the hell this amazing, bizarre book had been all my life. My love has only grown upon subsequent re-readings: Wuthering Heights is one of the strangest, most beautiful, most ludicrous, and most narratively complex novels I’ve ever read, and I can’t get enough of it. Who are these insane characters and why do they feel the need to say every thought they have the second they have it? Why do they all insist on marrying each other? Why does Mr. Lockwood keep nosing about their lives? Why don’t they ever go anywhere?? 1

If you’re a fan of Wuthering Heights—or, like me, you hated it at first and are now wondering whether you should try again—read on for some things you might not have known or noticed the first time through:

1. It is NOT a romance novel

I think one reason I hated Wuthering Heights the first time I read it was that I was expecting it to be a great love story. And then I got into the book and realized that it is, in fact, a story of terrible people doing terrible things to each other. I was outraged: Where was the love? Where was the romance?? I understood later that my expectations had been set by people who knew the story from the film adaptations of the novel, rather than the novel itself.

The film versions of Brontë’s novel usually go to great lengths to cast the Catherine/Heathcliff relationship as a passionate romance, I think because it’s much easier to film yet-another-doomed-love story than it is to capture what the novel is really about: a destructive relationship between two people who are obsessed with each other. Cathy’s famous line—“I am Heathcliff!”—is often touted as uber-romantic, but it expresses something that isn’t really about love: Cathy wants to be Heathcliff, to merge with him. After she dies, Heathcliff breaks down the side of her coffin so that, upon his own death, they can be buried next to each other and literally decompose into a single, shared body. They strive to transcend the boundaries of human subjectivity and physicality—to become something that is other and only them. Their relationship in the novel is strange and fascinating, but it’s not love. 1

it’s for these reasons that I found the whole Twilight thing hilarious. In Eclipse, Bella and Mr. Sparkly Von Vampire mention Wuthering Heights again and again as a corollary to their relationship. You want to model your relationship on an angry, controlling asshole and a cruel, spoiled brat? Er, have fun with that, kids. Harper Collins went so far as to release a “Twilight edition” of Brontë’s novel, bearing the slogan “Bella& Edward’s Favorite Book.” I’m sure Emily Brontë is THRILLED.)

2. It was first published under the name “Ellis Bell”

ll three of the Brontë sisters initially published their works with masculine pseudonyms: Charlotte was “Currer Bell,” Emily was “Ellis Bell,” and Anne was “Acton Bell.” Charlotte Brontë wrote later that they did so because “we had a vague impression that authoresses are liable to be looked on with prejudice.” The pseudonyms caused confusion later, when some readers assumed that Ellis and Currer Bell were the same person, and attributed Wuthering Heights to the author of the very popular Jane Eyre.

3. It’s a claustrophobic, surreal dreamscape

the Victorian novel is famous for realism—a literary movement that sought to portray life as it really is, even in its most everyday occurrences. But in Wuthering Heights, Brontë goes out of her way to make the reader feel dislocated and unsteady, to make the narrative seem like it exists in a world entirely separate from our own. From the start of the novel, the geographic isolation of the novel’s setting—the fact that we, as readers, never move beyond the boundaries of Wuthering Heights and Thrushcross Grange—has us wondering where the hell we are. Add to that the novel’s multiple frame narratives (at one point, we are reading Lockwood’s account of Nelly’s account of Isabella’s account of what happened, and it's... bewildering), and the reader is left spinning, looking for something solid to hold onto, at once trapped within the novel’s complicated narrative framework and locked outside any true, direct understanding of what’s going on. 3

4. There are approximately three names in the whole book

Seriously, the names are insane: There’s Catherine Earnshaw, Catherine Linton, Edgar and Isabella Linton, Hindley Earnshaw, Hareton Earnshaw, Heathcliff, and—most ridiculous—Linton Heathcliff. The names get extremely confusing, but I think that’s the point: They contribute to the claustrophobic quality of the novel as a whole. As we watch these people grapple with each other, all bearing similar names and all related in one way or another, we get the feeling that there’s no escape from it—as in the Hotel California, “You can check-out any time you like, But you can never leave [Wuthering Heights].”

5. It was not an instant bestseller

Wuthering Heights received mixed reviews from critics when it came out in 1847. Even those who liked it seemed puzzled by it more than anything—what were critics supposed to do with this weird, but compelling book? One reviewer expressed the general sense of confusion:

Wuthering Heights is a strange sort of book,—baffling all regular criticism; yet, it is impossible to begin and not finish it; and quite as impossible to lay it aside afterwards and say nothing about it.

Others hated it full-out, and were not shy about expressing their dislike of a novel populated by “savages” and lacking a moral lesson. These are just a couple of my favorites, from two American magazines:

We rise from the perusal of Wuthering Heights as if we had come fresh from a pest-house. Read Jane Eyre is our advice, but burn Wuthering Heights….

How a human being could have attempted such a book as the present without committing suicide before he had finished a dozen chapters, is a mystery.

6. Even Charlotte Brontë felt the need to distance herself from it

After Emily and Anne Brontë died in 1848 and 49, Charlotte Brontë continued to promote the works of her sisters. In the preface to the 1850 edition of Wuthering Heights, Charlotte writes of the novel’s power and her sister’s talent, but she also seems to feel the need to respond to the critics by making excuses for the novel’s “faults.” She blames the novel’s “rusticity” on Emily’s upbringing in Yorkshire, admitting that for those not raised in the North, “Wuthering Heights must appear a rude and strange production.” She also suggests that Emily was seized by inspiration and compelled to write what she did, as if she had no control over her writing; Charlotte writes that when Emily created her passionate, angsty characters, “Having formed these beings, she did not know what she had done.” We can see Charlotte here as a grieving sister trying to protect her loved one’s memory—but in the process, she strips Emily of her creative agency, recasting Wuthering Heights as the product of an almost supernatural vision, rather than artistic genius.

7. We don’t know where Heathcliff comes from

Heathcliff is one of the great mysteries of the novel. Why is he such an angry jerk? We know very little about his origins: All we’re told is that Mr. Earnshaw picked him up in Liverpool, he has dark hair and eyes, and, when he first arrives, he speaks “some gibberish that no one could understand.” Critics and readers have debated Heathcliff’s origins for more than a hundred and fifty years, without getting any closer to finding the answer. Because Liverpool was a major port for both Ireland and the slave trade, some scholars have proposed that Heathcliff may have been of Irish or African descent. The most recent film adaptation of Wuthering Heights (dir. Andrea Arnold), released in 2011, was the first to cast a black actor in the role.

8. This song

OK, so this song really has nothing to do with the book’s writing—it was released by British singer-songwriter Kate Bush in 1978—but I love it. Written when Bush was only 18, “Wuthering Heights,” like most of Bush’s music, is beautiful, haunting, and really, really weird. In a high soprano, Bush takes on the role of Catherine’s ghost, beating on Heathcliff’s windows, wailing, “Heathcliff, it’s me, I’m Cathy, I’ve come home, I’m so cold….” The video is wonderfully bizarre, with Bush dancing and cartwheeling across the screen. And if you can’t resist performing this very special dance when you’re alone in your apartment, well, that’s completely normal, right? (That’s what I tell myself, at least.)

Bonus Fact: There’s an MTV version

MTV made an adaptation of Wuthering Heights in 2003, and it’s precisely as terrible as you would imagine. Seriously, it is full-on, grade-A awful, and I watched the whole thing because I love Wuthering Heights that much. I think all I need to say about it is that Heathcliff gets his revenge by becoming a Rock Star! Just as god and the Brontë sisters intended.

 

 

The girl in the ice: A Konrad Simonsen Triller (2010, 2015) by Lotte and Soren Hammer

Brother and sister writing team. Second novel of the Konrad Simonsen series. Opening of book with the girl in the ice very disjointed from the later elements of novel. Cannot imagine writing ome og these scenes with my brother!  Hope their later novels have more fluency and follow through of events.
Image result for the girl in the ice image

Kirkus  review (thank you)

A killer who preys on beautiful women faces off against a team of Danish investigators.
Konrad Simonsen—variously referred to as “Simon,” “Konrad,” and “Simonsen”—is Copenhagen Homicide’s Chief Inspector. When he’s called in as he’s about to leave on a rare holiday and asked to lead the investigation into the murder of a woman found frozen in the ice not far from the site of an American installation that has since been decommissioned, he and his partner, Arne Pedersen, realize they may have a serial killer on their hands. Maryann Nygaard has been dead since she disappeared back in 1983, but her body shares one odd trait with another dead woman: they both had their fingernails cut by the killer. Gathering his team—investigators Pauline Berg and the Countess—the Danish detectives soon connect Maryann's killing to the solved murder of Catherine Thomsen, who died in 1997 and whose father killed himself after being accused of her slaying. Filled with guilt and determined to find the culprit, Simonsen and his detectives soon settle on a suspect and begin to unravel his life. The Hammers, a brother-and-sister team, have created a universe populated by some of the least interesting and most wooden characters ever to lead a police investigation, and they toss in clumsy, often bizarre dialogue for good measure. Rather than showing a steadily progressing inquiry as a good police procedural should, their meandering investigation seems more like a series of lucky guesses and chance discoveries. The foreshadowing reads like padding, and the presence of a character known as “the Countess” on a modern-day police department is mystifying. Readers will care little whether or not the murderer is apprehended and even less about the team assembled to find him or her.
Fans of Scandinavian noir won’t find much to like about this jumbled entry in the field.